#geowebchat transcript, 16 April 2013

@mappingmashups 10:06am Reminder! In today’s #geowebchat (Tues Apr 16) at 12pm PDT (3pm EDT, 8pm BST) we will look back on #AAG2013. Join us! mappingmashups.net/2013/04/14/nex…

@mappingmashups 12:00pm Welcome to today’s #geowebchat everyone! We’ll be discussing #AAG2013 and related events from LA: #ironsheep, #geocode, etc.

@mappingmashups 12:01pm If you want to follow along, try: tweetchat.com/room/geowebchat. If you want to ignore us, mute the hashtag #geowebchat (but I hope you don’t!)

@mappingmashups 12:02pm I suggested 4 main themes for today’s #geowebchat: mappingmashups.net/2013/04/14/nex… We can do 15 minutes for each, unless ppl have other preferences.

@JessiBreen 12:03pm Team f.e.t.a. in the house! #geowebchat

@bricker 12:03pm #AAG2013 + #ironsheep + #geocode = so much intellectually stimulating geonerdery fun!! #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:03pm I missed AAG – sounds like there were great sessions. Recap, please! #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:04pm First topic: all the #geoweb sessions that were part of #AAG2013 itself. Which were your faves? How did they work together, etc? #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:04pm @mappingmashups like idea of geoweb conference; tho already 1 w/ that name. Include non-geographers, STSers, info scientists #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:05pm +1 on a #geoweb conference – and should include practitioners as well, human rights and aid workers, as well as academics #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:06pm @USGSTNMRes The #geocode track was like a #geoweb conference within a conference. I thought it worked very well. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:06pm My fave @ #AAG2013 was the crisis mapping session #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:07pm @mappingmashups @USGSTNMRes #geocode track would have improved with consistent theme, names like cyberGIS #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:07pm @mappingmashups good idea to keep #geocode under the AAG tent. Too many conferences = too diffuse a community #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:07pm .@re_sieber mine as well! it was a great session #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:08pm I liked how some Friday presenters (I’m thinking @eknalprev in particular) were able to draw together many themes from prev days #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:08pm overall #AAG2013: w retiremt of dMark, cyberGIS & spatio-temporal reasoning, GIScience tribe lost a lot of steam #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:09pm @peterajohnson @mappingmashups Agreed. Travel money is tight, don’t make me choose! #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:09pm @peterajohnson @mappingmashups @USGSTNMRes Let’s return to this discussion about how to do it next year at the end of this chat. #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:11pm @re_sieber I would like to think that the steam era of GIScience is over – lots of new propulsion coming down the pipe! #geowebchat

@bricker 12:11pm @re_sieber Did the term/should the term cyberGIS retire too? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:11pm @re_sieber Do you think the GIScience/CyberGIS stream/tribe was engaging with the geoweb track, or oblivious? #geowebchat

@wilsonism 12:11pm #geowebchat I really enjoyed @ash_ecotechnics talk in the session on technology and memory.

@peterajohnson 12:11pm @bricker if you can make that happen…please do it! #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:12pm @bricker @re_sieber You have an opinion on that @geoplace? #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:12pm @peterajohnson GIScience is the steampunk of geospatial research. #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:12pm @mappingmashups yes, but except 4 crisis session did not draw the interesting comp sci, STS, info sic talks #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:13pm @mappingmashups Outside of #bigdata overlap, #cyberGIS is even more oblivious to #geoweb, social issues than #GIScience #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:13pm @mappingmashups @re_sieber CyberGIS is withdrawal of GIScience into cloud to escape the burgeoning GeoWebbers #geowebchat

@geoplace 12:14pm @JessiBreen @bricker @re_sieber I shudder when I hear the prefix ‘cyber’ #geowebchat (and yes I’m also guilty of using it)

@mappingmashups 12:14pm #bigdata also made a big splash this year: Loved the social network analysis session #3625 w/ Petr, Ate, Joe, Monica, etc. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:15pm @JessiBreen @bricker @geoplace #cyberGIS, despite protest, is software engineering; #GIScience is computer science/algorithms #geowebchat

@mhaklay 12:15pm @USGSTNMRes so did you feel that geoweb is the replacement of Critical GIS? #geowebchat

@skorasaurus 12:15pm any great reviews/wrap-ups of #AAG2013 w/ presentation links floating around ? #geowebchat

@bricker 12:15pm @geoplace @JessiBreen @re_sieber I hear a scifi robot voice when I read the prefix ‘cyber’ #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:16pm @geoplace @JessiBreen @bricker There were almost one #cyberGIS session per timeslot this #AAG2013. So hard to ignore #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:16pm Battle of the titans #bigdata panel Kitchin/Gorman/Batty/Goodchild/Barnes was great, but lacked enough conversation at the end #geowebchat

@eknalprev 12:17pm @mappingmashups conversation was inaudible in the back. the right room would have done more miracles #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 12:18pm ditto RT @wilsonism: #geowebchat I really enjoyed @ash_ecotechnics talk in the session on technology and memory. #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:18pm @mappingmashups so sorry I missed #bigdata in favor of a $40 lunch! #geowebchat

@wilsonism 12:19pm #geowebchat Re: ‘cyber’. See @geoplace ‘Ethereal Alternate Dimensions of Cyberspace or Grounded Augmented Realities?’ ow.ly/k7MYw

@re_sieber 12:19pm @mappingmashups @geoplace: good debate on #bigdata w Kitchen, @SeanGorman, Batty, Goodchild, Barnes. Well-trodden &new battles #geowebchat

@aSheepinSpace 12:19pm @peterajohnson does also something cute die everytime you use the “cyber” prefix? #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:20pm Maybe #bigdata conversants can be talked into writing something up??? #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:20pm @aSheepinSpace potentially…I’m sad/glad that my snarky commentary carried on IRL #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:20pm @skorasaurus No wrap-ups that I’ve seen yet. But you can trawl the #AAG2013 hashtag for links here: eventifier.co/event/aag2013/ #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:21pm thought the #bigdata panel was great, but room to small, hard to hear, not enough space. Someone said it was filmed? #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:21pm @bricker @geoplace @JessiBreen @re_sieber I read in a book on activism that the only people who should say “cyber” are academics #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:22pm @mhaklay @USGSTNMRes #geoweb is not complete overlap w CritGIS, although all geoweb presenters @ #AAG2013 did CritGIS #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:22pm @skorasaurus There’s also the “virtual geography convention” gathered up by @Catholicgauze: geographictravels.com/search/label/V… #aag2013 #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:22pm @cameranashraf @bricker @geoplace @re_sieber Why’s that? #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:22pm @USGSTNMRes @mappingmashups CyberGIS is GIScientists hiding in the cloud of code #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:23pm So, let’s start to move on to question #2: about #ironsheep and any other unofficial #AAG2013 events. Was #ironsheep a success? #geowebchat

@geoplace 12:23pm @joncinnamon The big data panel was filmed and we’re also turning it into a themed issue of Dialogues in Human Geography #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 12:23pm #geowebchat I have the same reaction to ‘GIS’ when used in ref to geoweb/spatial media/VGI etc. as to the ‘cyber’ handle #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:24pm @JessiBreen @cameranashraf @bricker @geoplace The cyber in #cyberGIS reminds me of the ’80s and big cellphones for some reason #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:25pm .@mattzook couldn’t join this chat, but he sent along some comments from the Thursday morning #ironsheep debrief session… #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:25pm @mappingmashups i didn’t hear about #ironsheep until after the event, so i think better advertising would be great #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:25pm @JessiBreen @bricker @geoplace @re_sieber because the term is dated and evocative of a certain way of seeing technology #geowebchat

@aSheepinSpace 12:25pm #ironsheep was educating to me. lots of fun as well #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:25pm @mappingmashups I enjoyed #ironsheep. Too much testosterone, though. #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:25pm @mappingmashups a consistent internet connection is preferable, but most teams pulled it together anyway. That’s a real test! #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:25pm @re_sieber @cameranashraf @bricker @geoplace Reminds me of my terrible 1st job as an AOL DigitalCity chat host.#geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:26pm …some suggested #ironsheep needed to be more inviting to ppl uncertain of their skills. Maybe an “ironlamb” for newbies? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:26pm …Also the space for #ironsheep was small this year, maybe a bigger space to let in more ppl? Maybe on-site at the conf, even? #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:27pm @re_sieber @mappingmashups I was impressed with the number of women, but there can always be more. #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:27pm @geoplace brilliant, look forward to seeing it in Dialogues #geowebchat

@wilsonism 12:27pm #geowebchat #ironsheep was a success: thought into action (into thought).

@eknalprev 12:27pm @mappingmashups or “ironewe” to reduce the testosterone @re_sieber #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:28pm …someone (@geographerliz ?) suggested more #ironsheep events outside of AAG, possibly a DC event? #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:28pm @eknalprev @mappingmashups @re_sieber No. I don’t want to be a female coder, just a coder. #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:28pm @mappingmashups iron lamb a great idea! I would come #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:28pm @mappingmashups, not a bad idea. #ironsheep does seem a bit cliquey, and aimed at only the geekiest of the map geeks #geowebchat

@spara 12:29pm @mappingmashups Perhaps copper lamb #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:30pm why not coordinate with other geography depts to have ironsheep clubs or meetups outside of aag? #geowebchat

@eknalprev 12:30pm I would like a bit longer #ironsheep to see if more sense and/or creativity can be cooked from the data #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:30pm @joncinnamon Although there is something to be said for exclusivity (if not cliquey) if it means things actually get done… #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:31pm @joncinnamon …I am all for openness, but some argued that letting in too many spectators could hinder learning/experimentation #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:31pm @spara @mappingmashups For newbies, how ab #acousticlamb: mapping wo tech? #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:32pm @JessiBreen @eknalprev Yes, I don’t think separating the sexes would improve anything. Also, it’s IronSheep, not IronRam. #geowebchat

@bricker 12:33pm @eknalprev that is a good idea. or maybe two shorter events for reflection purposes but time is limited for everyone at #AAG #geowebchat

@cameranashraf 12:33pm or why not #ideasheep (terrible, i know) where we mashup ideas, theories, or conventions on tech and geography? #geowebchat

@bricker 12:34pm @re_sieber #sheepunplugged #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:34pm @mappingmashups true, guess it depends on if purpose is to achieve something, or just have fun, socialize etc. Ideally both! #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:35pm What do you all think of having #ironsheep onsite at the conference? Perhaps even in the exhibits hall so people can watch? #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:35pm @cameranashraf @cameranashraf great idea, & I think it could be successful. I could introduce it to my “geoweb” students #geowebchat

@eknalprev 12:36pm @mappingmashups definite good option to showcase #ironsheep to bigger audience #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:36pm @mappingmashups a provocative idea! #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:36pm @bricker @eknalprev Speaking of #AAG2013, @bricker shud discuss her talk here @ #geowebchat on using #geowebchat for research #recursion

@agaleszczynski 12:36pm @joncinnamon alt.sheep (for the non-geekiest of the map geeks)? #geowebchat

@rushgeo 12:37pm @mappingmashups it would mean no beer or food, and possible schedule conflicts. Good outreach opportunity, though. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:37pm Sounds like there’s enthusiastic support for #ironsheepDC from @SeanGorman @geographerliz @weismana @JessiBreen (adding #geowebchat tag)

@EmmaSlager 12:38pm Exhibit hall could be great but I think you’d have to find a way to limit distractions for participants or not much wld get done #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:38pm One output of #ironsheep was a flood of drunken tweets hitting the #AAG2013 hashtag. Any thoughts/regrets about that? #geowebchat

@bricker 12:38pm @mappingmashups @SeanGorman Could there be exciting datasets to work with? and can it be in July? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:39pm Q3 about twitter use at #AAG2013. It was the most twitter-active AAG so far. Did that change how you experienced it? #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:40pm @mappingmashups Happily, the bo peep team was parsimonious w tweets ab its project #Gollum #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:40pm @mappingmashups that would defintiely scare off the less experienced. Depends what your goals are. #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:40pm Yes! See u in Santa Barbara next year! RT @agaleszczynski: @joncinnamon alt.sheep (for the non-geekiest of the map geeks)? #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:40pm @mappingmashups Just that my spiderman tweet was done so poorly. #geowebchat

@A_C_Robinson 12:40pm I’d like to know about how education plays a role with the geoweb community. #geowebchat Each year brings new trendy topics – some that last

@mappingmashups 12:40pm @re_sieber @bricker @eknalprev I’m certainly thinking about today’s chat differently after our presentation on #geowebchat at #AAG2013

@SeanGorman 12:40pm @mappingmashups @geographerliz it would be cool to get govt agencies to bring their data as part of #IronSheepDC #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:41pm @mappingmashups I do find it strange that the tweets have been archived for posterity. Some things should be forgotten (re: RKit #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:41pm @A_C_Robinson @bricker talked about use of hashtags as research method #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 12:42pm all we need is a sshrc grant to fund it RT @joncinnamon: Yes! See u in Santa Barbara next year! #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:42pm @mappingmashups Did anyone actually get drunk? I had one beer & then they were gone. Not stoked I was tagged “chugging” it. #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:42pm @SeanGorman @mappingmashups @geographerliz #ironsheepDC Don’t worry, we’re government. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:43pm @A_C_Robinson Could think of #ironsheep as a kind of hands-on education. Learning/sharing the tools is key for many #geowebbers #geowebchat

@EmmaSlager 12:44pm @mappingmashups def diff in geoweb sessions and others re norms of cell use/twit activity-saw some miffed presenters & audiences #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:44pm @peterajohnson It’s hard to search old tweets, but I’m always aware they’re permanently public. Library of Congress saves ‘em. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:45pm @peterajohnson Ur not only archived 4posterity but bc u were in @bricker’s slides u were @ #AAG2013 even tho u didn’t attend #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:45pm Do people have an expectation of privacy or merely obscurity when they use twitter? Did @theAAG have an obligation to warn us? #geowebchat

@bricker 12:46pm @EmmaSlager @mappingmashups fuzzy times in terms of social etiquette and twitter #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:46pm RT @wisemana: @mappingmashups I think on site at AAG is a great idea #geowebchat

@A_C_Robinson 12:47pm Observation – last 10yrs = GIS, Geovisualization, Geovisual Analytics, LBS, Web Mapping, FOSS4G, CyberGIS, GeoWeb, GeoHCI, etc. #geowebchat

@bricker 12:47pm @re_sieber I asked @peterajohnson and the others who were quoted for permission! #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:47pm @mappingmashups well, there is a pic of you having a beer on the eventifier landing page. Nothing bad, but still… #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 12:48pm @mappingmashups @bricker this is kind of dated (bit.ly/zCuLt) but beware ‘tweeting your way in and out of tenure’? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:48pm @peterajohnson As long as everyone else in the photo looks worse than me, I’m cool with it. :) #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:50pm A future research topic? RT @bricker: @EmmaSlager @mappingmashups fuzzy times in terms of social etiquette and twitter #geowebchat

@joeeckert 12:50pm ack! look up and I’m 50 minutes into #geowebchat. sorry gang, lots of post-aag paperwork

@mappingmashups 12:51pm I think each of my four Qs could fill a full #geowebchat! We can come back to talking about twitter another day. But now, Q4: next steps?

@JessiBreen 12:51pm @joeeckert I was wondering where the rest of Team f.e.t.a. was hiding. #geowebchat

@A_C_Robinson 12:51pm @mappingmashups I think only if you don’t understand how Twitter works. It’s information anyone can see and save. #geowebchat #sharewisely

@mappingmashups 12:52pm Q4: what should the #geoweb presence look like at #AAG2014? A preconference? Another #geocode track? #CyberGIS grudge match? #geowebchat

@joeeckert 12:52pm @mappingmashups I quite liked the #geowebchat pre-conf idea.

@CraigMDalton 12:53pm @JessiBreen @joeeckert #geowebchat I just got here- I teach untill 3:30

@re_sieber 12:53pm @joncinnamon @bricker @EmmaSlager @mappingmashups ‘fuzzy times ITO social etiquette & #geowebchat twitter’ I thought you meant too much beer

@USGSTNMRes 12:53pm @mappingmashups PARTAY in Tampa!!!! #aag2014 #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:54pm @mappingmashups @ #AAG2014 I want #cagematch between #geoweb and #cyberGIS #geowebchat. 2 enter, 1 leaves.

@EmmaSlager 12:54pm @mappingmashups GRUDGE MATCH! But really, how could the two be better integrated? #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 12:54pm no need to get hung up on the (dated) cyberGIS term; was used as it was fundable under NSF cyberinfrastructure prog. #geowebchat

@ge01d 12:54pm @re_sieber @bricker That’s how I read it at first too #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:55pm @mappingmashups how about a #cyberGIS vs. #geoweb team foosball tournament? Winner takes “all”? #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:55pm +1 RT @joeeckert: @mappingmashups I quite liked the #geowebchat pre-conf idea. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:55pm Many have talked about a preconference. We must make sure we work together and nobody duplicates effort. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:55pm @joeeckert @mappingmashups @ #AAG2014, let’s have a #geowebchat pre-unconference

@agaleszczynski 12:55pm as long as it’s in a space with temp equilibrium RT @joeeckert: @mappingmashups I quite liked the #geowebchat pre-conf idea. #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 12:56pm cybergis and geoweb are orthogonal; unless you refer to opposing personalities :) #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:56pm @re_sieber An unconference, huh? Interesting. Competing impulses between more or less formality for the preconf. #geowebchat

@SterlingGIS 12:56pm @mappingmashups Nice talk on map gardening at #AAG2013. Maybe good exercise for undergrads? Or shouldn’t be a required activity? #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 12:56pm @re_sieber you can be the un-chair…;) #geowebchat

@A_C_Robinson 12:56pm @re_sieber Yep, easily taken out of context, hence #sharewisely. I assume everything on the web can be used against me. :( #geowebchat

@re_sieber 12:56pm @michael_d_gould You’re taking our fun away. We obsess/fight ab terms in geography! #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 12:57pm @michael_d_gould expand on this #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 12:57pm @mappingmashups preconf a nice idea, but might restrict who can come. sessions in AAG allows more to come, plus non geowebbers #geowebchat

@joeeckert 12:57pm somewhat hilarious that we’re thinking about the implications of a beer-in-hand in comparison to the wildness that is AAG #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:57pm @re_sieber I think some ppl (I won’t name names) favored a preconference because it could be more rigorous. So not unconference. #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 12:58pm @USGSTNMRes cybergis is big data, hi performance geoprocessing, not incompatible w backend of geoweb stuff. #geowebchat

@SeanGorman 12:58pm @michael_d_gould judging the sessions there are quite a few differences as well – computational, methodological and literature #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 12:59pm @mappingmashups @re_sieber It could be Survivor-themed. Vote each other off the island. Or maybe just a pool party. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 12:59pm I also won’t name names on this either, but the idea of a geoweb specialty group has also been floated. Thoughts? #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 12:59pm @re_sieber ok, well, then make a grudge match on a Florida swamp fanboat !! #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 12:59pm pre/un-conferences work best when they’re small …. have we gotten too big? #geowebchat

@joeeckert 12:59pm @mappingmashups also would be interested in #geowebchat specialty group…but what of GIS / cyberGIS? too much?

@JessiBreen 1:00pm @joeeckert AAG is how I make up for those Spring Break trips I could never afford to go on as an undergrad. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:00pm Sounds like “#CyberGIS != #Geoweb?” should be a future #geowebchat topic. Anyone want to host it?

@USGSTNMRes 1:00pm @JessiBreen @mappingmashups @re_sieber or a BEACH PARTY!!! #geowebchat

@EmmaSlager 1:00pm @joeeckert it seems like too much…

@joncinnamon 1:00pm Some say its ALL we do! RT @re_sieber: @michael_d_gould You’re taking our fun away. We obsess/fight ab terms in geography! #geowebchat

@SeanGorman 1:00pm @mappingmashups heard similar discussions as well re: specialty group – also discussed if there is a better term than “geoweb” #geowebchat

@geographerliz 1:01pm @SeanGorman @mappingmashups since I’m on a mission to free up as much data as possible, definitely a good extension #IronSheepDC #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 1:01pm @mappingmashups what would difference be with speciality group vs. a track under GIScience? #geowebchat

@A_C_Robinson 1:01pm @michael_d_gould Also, recall folks establishing neocartography by saying it was anti-cartography. A fight where none is needed. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 1:01pm @michael_d_gould #geowebchat ters are definitely orthogonal, not georegistered nor rectified, skewed (& any other term I can dredge up)

@mappingmashups 1:01pm @SeanGorman No, there is no better term than geoweb! #geowebchat

@joeeckert 1:01pm @EmmaSlager and if only to devil’s A myself, i think we are fairly different from GIS / cyberGIS. should we be? #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 1:01pm @mappingmashups We should engage some CyberGISers for this #geowebchat

@joncinnamon 1:02pm Really good question. RT @agaleszczynski: pre/un-conferences work best when they’re small …. have we gotten too big? #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 1:02pm @mappingmashups wld love to host this one (cyber)GIS != goeoweb #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 1:02pm I like debates where one takes both sides: own and strawman (sic) #geowebchat

@joeeckert 1:02pm @agaleszczynski I wasn’t there — are we much bigger than the VGI pre-conf in Seattle? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:02pm @A_C_Robinson @michael_d_gould I certainly wondered why we would inflict the term “neocartography” on ourselves after #neogeo #geowebchat

@SeanGorman 1:03pm @geographerliz @mappingmashups would be great to let loose the data around a focused exercise and diversity of approaches! #geowebchat

@EmmaSlager 1:03pm Word. RT @USGSTNMRes @mappingmashups We should engage some CyberGISers for this #geowebchat #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 1:03pm YES MT @joeeckert: i think we are fairly different from GIS / cyberGIS. should we be? #geowebchat

@re_sieber 1:03pm @mappingmashups At least we could label all geoweb, geocode sessions as #geowebchat. That would provide the conference within a conference

@joeeckert 1:03pm @agaleszczynski couldn’t agree more. :) #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 1:04pm @re_sieber don’t forget fuzzy and imprecise #geowebchat

@agaleszczynski 1:04pm @joeeckert way bigger than VGI pre-con #geowebchat

@kennethfield 1:04pm it was only a matter of time before neocart decided it was better to be a part than apart @A_C_Robinson: @michael_d_gould #geowebchat

@re_sieber 1:04pm @mappingmashups I’ll host “#CyberGIS v #Geoweb, provided that both terms last out the year! #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 1:04pm Gotta run, but great turn out today – lots of enthusiasm. This is a great tribe to be a part of (no matter what label you use) #geowebchat

@spara 1:04pm @geographerliz @SeanGorman @mappingmashups Yay data liberation #Geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:04pm We’ve hit the end of our #geowebchat. Will definitely revisit two topics in later chats: “CyberGIS and Geoweb” and “twitter within academia”

@mappingmashups 1:05pm Any last thoughts about #AAG2013? #geowebchat

@michael_d_gould 1:05pm @re_sieber but seriously I encourage you (someone) to run that session in Tampa. not enough real debate these. #geowebchat

@spara 1:06pm cybersocialmobilegeospatial is the future #geowebchat

@USGSTNMRes 1:06pm @mappingmashups thanks! nice chat #geowebchat

@disruptivegeo 1:06pm @spara forgot #cloud #geowebchat

@re_sieber 1:06pm @mappingmashups We need to take opportunities for upping #geowebchat presence as #GIScience is finding (flailing?) its way post-Goodchild

@michael_d_gould 1:06pm @mappingmashups #AAG2013 was great for getting folks together, but backchannel makes it 10x better. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:07pm As always, I want more guest hosts and topic ideas! Volunteer before you get volunteered! #geowebchat

@JessiBreen 1:07pm @spara That’s gonna get hard to fit in a tweet. #geowebchat

@peterajohnson 1:07pm @re_sieber aka neo vs. paleo, round two? #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:08pm Don’t forget that we have a new webcal link so you never miss a #geowebchat again! webcal://bit.ly/geowebchatcal

@cameranashraf 1:08pm many thanks for the excellent #geowebchat! it was my first and i hope to attend more.

@kennethfield 1:08pm here here! RT @kirkgoldsberry: just call everything “Mapping” again. #geowebchat /// let’s stop making up new words for existing practices.

@re_sieber 1:08pm @mappingmashups I’ll host next week. I’d like #geoweb: ‘that sh1t is hard to teach’: getting our colleagues to appreciate it #geowebchat

@geographerliz 1:09pm @SeanGorman @mappingmashups so much potential for some #geoglobaldomination awesomeness – great to add in some of the analytics! #geowebchat

@joeeckert 1:09pm @re_sieber @mappingmashups already interested. completely up my alley. #geowebchat

@re_sieber 1:09pm @peterajohnson #CyberGIS v #Geoweb: neo GIScience v neogeo #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:10pm And also many people at #AAG2013 weren’t aware of our subdisciplinary announcement list geoweb-r: bit.ly/geowebr #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:11pm @re_sieber Okay! You get May 7. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:12pm Next #geowebchat is in 3 weeks: May 7. Host is @re_sieber: “#geoweb: ‘that sh1t is hard to teach’: getting our colleagues to appreciate it”

@sophiabliu 1:12pm Wud be great to have more local #Ironsheep events at mapping parties to gain momentum then have bigger ones at conferences. #geowebchat

@mappingmashups 1:13pm The transcript for today’s #geowebchat will be posted at mappingmashups.net/geowebchat in a few hours or days. You have been warned!

@eknalprev 1:14pm Marking my calendar! Next #geowebchat 7/5 Host @re_sieber: “#geoweb: ‘that sh1t is hard to teach’: getting our colleagues to appreciate it”

This entry was posted in geowebchat, Mapping, Networks. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>